NOTICE
OF UNDERSTANDING AND INTENT AND CLAIM OF RIGHT
Dear,
Addressed persons
I
here present you with a Notice of Understanding and Intent. I am
sending this letter out as a courtesy in order to avoid any further
confusion or potential conflict. I am now expanding the reach of my
discourse in order to maintain my honor and ensure maximum clarity
between myself and all agents of government. After receiving this
letter, please expect a Notice of Understanding and Claim of Right in
order to ensure maximum clarity amongst all parties.As a peaceful man
desiring to avoid conflict and live lawfully with maximum freedom, I
have recently been studying the history of the united states along
with its legal system and have come to some very interesting
conclusions. After reading various acts and exploring the way
language is used in those acts, I have realized that "lawful” and
"legal” are not always the same. It also appears that all acts
and statutes in US are only contracts based in commerce. Therefore I
am now contacting the various government officials named above in the
hopes that someone can either confirm or correct my understanding. If
you do choose to respond with corrections, I must insist that you do
so within Fourteen(14) days of service of this letter, in writing,
via registered mail and provide proof of your claim, under oath or
attestation with full commercial liability and penalty of perjury. A
lack of response or response that does not contain proof of my
mistaken understanding, on a point-by-point basis, will be assumed to
imply agreement with my understanding. Failure to dispute the claims
made herein will result in an automatic default judgment and
permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence. Now, specifically
in The United States I understand that there is both a common law and
statute law tradition, which is interesting, because I also
understand that a statute is a legislated rule of a society, which
has the force of law upon members of that society; a society being a
fictional legal entity such as a corporation. I also understand that
the Government of the US is not a nation as I thought it was,
occupying a geographical location, but instead merely a corporation
with de-facto authority, rather than lawful. This corporation can
only make corporate/contract law that has the force of law only upon
its consenting members. From my research, the "law of the land,”
is the peaceful common law, which is not influenced by acts and
statutes. Under common law, the rights, freedoms, and duties of
private individuals have long been established and unlike statute
law, common law has had a progression towards more freedom and
personal responsibility rather than less. Among the rights and
freedoms understood by common law are such things as the rights to
life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, property and use thereof,
privacy, peace, and the ability to travel freely in public without
harassment or intimidation. The obligations and duties of those
living under common law are essentially to ensure that one does not
infringe or allow others to infringe upon those unalienable rights
and freedoms.I have also learned that the rights of a free spiritual
being cannot be lawfully limited without consent, as that would imply
slavery. Effectively, rights are not bestowed upon one by another
unless the first gives his/her consent, or the first is the lawful
property of the second. The very nature of the concept of consent is
that it can only exist amongst equals with full disclosure and
without coercion. I do not recall ever being sold or purchased as a
slave, nor do I recall giving my free consent to be governed or
represented by any governmental agent, although at times I have been
deceived and intimidated into submission. Although the various rights
and freedoms are self-evident and unalienable, in order to be. In
order for lawful representation to exist, there must be mutual
consent, and that consent may be revoked for any reason depending on
the nature of a specific contract between the two parties. I am
hereby notifying all who read this and any other interested parties
that I have revoked my consent to be governed by fictitious corporate
entities with which I do not have a subsisting contract. I declare
that I am neither a child nor a slave, but a free man capable of
administering my own affairs.
Notice
of Understanding and Intent And Claim of Right
Whereas
it is my understanding The United States of America is a common law
jurisdiction, and, Whereas it is my understanding equality before
the law is paramount and mandatory, and, Whereas it is my
understanding a statute is defined as a legislated rule of society
which has been given the force of law, and, Whereas it is my
understanding a society is defined as a number of people joined by
mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal,
and, Whereas it is my understanding the only form of government
recognized as lawful in The United States of America is a
representative one, and, Whereas it is my understanding
representation requires mutual consent, and, Whereas it is my
understanding that in the absence of mutual consent neither
representation nor governance can exist, and,, Whereas it is my
understanding those who have a SSN (Social Security Number) are in
fact employees of the federal government and thus are bound by the
statutes created by the federal government, and, Whereas it is my
understanding that it is lawful to abandon one’s SSN, and, Whereas
it is my understanding people in The United States of America have a
right to revoke or deny consent to be represented and thus governed,
and, Whereas it is my understanding if anyone does revoke or deny
consent they exist free of government control and statutory
restraints, and, Whereas a Freeman-on-the-Land has lawfully
revoked consent and does exist free of statutory restrictions,
obligations, and limitations, and, Whereas I, Given name: Family
name am a Freeman-on-the-Land, and, Whereas it is my understanding
that acting peacefully within community standards does not breach the
peace, and, Whereas it is my understanding that any action for
which one can apply for and receive a license must itself be a
fundamentally lawful action, and, Whereas as I am a
Freeman-on-the-Land who operates with full responsibility and not a
child, I do not see the need to ask permission to engage in lawful
and peaceful activities, especially from those who claim limited
liability, and, Whereas it is my understanding a by-law is defined
as a rule of a corporation, and, Whereas it is my understanding
corporations are legal fictions and require contracts in order to
claim authority or control over other parties, and, Whereas it is
my understanding legal fictions lack a soul and cannot exert any
control over those who are thus blessed and operate with respect to
that knowledge as only a fool would allow soulless fictions to
dictate ones actions, and, Whereas it is my understanding that I
have a right to use my property without having to pay for the use or
enjoyment of it, and, Whereas it is my understanding that a
summons is merely an invitation to attend and the ones issued by the
United States or any of its agencies creates no obligation or
dishonor if ignored, and, Whereas it is my understanding peace
officers have a duty to distinguish between statutes and law and
those who attempt to enforce statutes against a Freeman-on-the-Land
are in fact breaking the law, and, Whereas I have the power to
refuse intercourse or interaction with peace officers who have not
observed me breach the peace, and, Whereas permanent estoppel by
acquiescence barring any peace officer or prosecutor from bringing
charges against a Freeman-on-the-Land under any Act is created if
this claim is not responded to in the stated fashion and time,
Therefore
be it now known to any and all concerned and affected parties, that
I, ______:_______a Freeman-on-the-Land do hereby state clearly
specifically and unequivocally my intent to peacefully and lawfully
exist free of all statutory obligations restrictions and maintain all
rights at law to trade, exchange or barter .
Furthermore,
I claim that these actions are not outside my communities’
standards and will in fact support said community in our desire for
truth and maximum freedom.
Furthermore,
I claim the right to engage in these actions and further claim that
all property held by me is held under a claim of right.
Furthermore,
I claim that anyone who interferes with my lawful activities after
having been served notice of this claim and who fails to properly
dispute or make lawful counterclaim is breaking the law, cannot claim
good faith or colour of right and that such transgressions will be
dealt with in a properly convened court de jure.
Furthermore,
I claim that the courts in The United States are de-facto and are in
fact in the profitable business of conducting, witnessing and
facilitating the transactions of security interests and I further
claim they require the consent of both parties prior to providing any
such services.
Furthermore,
I claim all transactions of security interests require the consent of
both parties and I do hereby deny consent to any transaction of a
security interest issuing under any Act for as herein stated as a
Freeman-on-the-Land I am not subject to any Act.
Furthermore,
I claim my FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressions by peace officers,
government principals or agents or justice system participants is TWO
HUNDRED DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if being questioned,
interrogated or in any way detained, harassed or otherwise regulated
and TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if I am
handcuffed, transported, incarcerated or subjected to any
adjudication process without my express written and Notarized
consent.
Furthermore,
I claim the right to use a Notary Public to secure payment of the
aforementioned FEE SCHEDULE against any transgressors who by their
actions or omissions harm me or my interests, directly or by proxy in
any way.
Furthermore,
I claim the right to convene a proper court de jure in order to
address any potentially criminal actions of any peace officers,
government principals or agents or justice system participants who
having been served notice of this claim fail to dispute or discuss or
make lawful counterclaim and then interfere by act or omission with
the lawful exercise of properly claimed and established rights and
freedoms.
Furthermore,
I claim the law of agent and principal applies and that service upon
one is service upon both.
Furthermore,
I claim the right to deal with any counterclaims or disputes publicly
and in an open forum using discussion and negotiation and to capture
on video tape said discussion and negotiation for whatever lawful
purpose as I see fit. Affected parties wishing to dispute the
claims made herein or make their own counterclaims must respond
appropriately within Fourteen (14) days of service of notice of this
action. Responses must be under Oath or attestation, upon full
commercial liability and penalty of perjury and registered in the
Notary Office herein provided no later than fourteen days from the
date of original service as attested to by way of certificate of
service.
Failure
to register a dispute against the claims made herein will result in
an automatic default judgment and permanent and irrevocable estoppel
by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any statute or
Act against My Self Freeman-on-the-Land ________:________
Place
of claim of right:
Dated:
__________________________________
Claimant:
_________:_________
Notary
Public: ____________________________
Use
of a Notary is for attestation and verification purposes only and
does not constitute a change in status or entrance or acceptance of
foreign jurisdiction.
Outline
and information comes from ThinkFree.ca, and can be used in any
commonwealth jurisdiction.
They
have a few videos on google |